7 best Greptile alternatives (2026): pricing and precision
Wendy Zhang · · 10 min read
Greptile reviews pull requests with a graph of your whole repository and sells prepaid credits at $1 each, with no seat fees. The alternatives below differ from it in three ways that matter day to day: how they bill, which Git hosts they support, and how often their comments turn out to be right.
The best Greptile alternatives are HeyDeer, Cursor Bugbot, Qodo, cubic, CodeRabbit, Claude Code Review and Graphite. HeyDeer has the highest ReviewBench precision (99.0%) and costs $14 a month for 10 developers. CodeRabbit, Bugbot and Qodo also cover GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps; Graphite suits stacked pull requests.
Greptile alternatives compared
| Tool | Best for | How you pay | Platforms | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeyDeer | Precise reviews on GitHub with no seat fees | One workspace plan from $9 a month, shared credits | GitHub | Free plan: 1,000 credits in the first month, then 300 a month |
| Cursor Bugbot | Teams that already write code in Cursor | Per run, about $1.00–$1.50 on average | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | Individuals use included Cursor usage first |
| Qodo | Teams up to 30 users who want one pooled credit pack | Pooled credits at $0.012 each, about $1.67 per review | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps | 14-day trial; open-source program |
| cubic | GitHub teams that prefer a flat price per developer | $32 (Team) or $79.20 (Pro) per developer a month, billed annually | GitHub | None listed |
| CodeRabbit | Teams on several Git hosts who also want reviews in the IDE and CLI | $24 (Essentials) or $48 (Team) per developer a month, billed annually | GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket | Free on public repositories; 14-day trial |
| Claude Code Review | Organizations already on Claude Team or Enterprise | Token usage on top of a Claude Team or Enterprise plan | GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Server | Requires a Claude Team or Enterprise plan |
| Graphite | Teams that work in stacked pull requests | $40 per user a month on Team, billed annually | GitHub, including GitHub Enterprise Server | Hobby plan with limited AI reviews |
| Greptile | Large repositories where cross-file context matters | $1 per prepaid credit, no seat fees | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket Cloud; self-hosted hosts on Enterprise | Starter: one developer, 50 credits a month |
What the same workload costs
10 developers, each opening 10 pull requests a month, every pull request reviewed once. Precision is ReviewBench’s default high-severity view; a dash means the tool isn’t on the leaderboard.
| Tool | 10 developers / month | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeyDeer | $14 | 99.0% | 51.4% |
| Cursor Bugbot | $100–$150 | 96.0% | 44.5% |
| Qodo | $167 | 95.3% | 53.3% |
| cubic | $320 | 93.5% | 22.1% |
| CodeRabbit | $240 | — | — |
| Claude Code Review | $1,500–$2,500 (research-preview reference) | — | — |
| Graphite | $400 | — | — |
| Greptile (Base reviews) | $100 | 95.2% | 20.2% |
USD list prices before tax, checked ; Greptile and cubic prices checked . ReviewBench checked . HeyDeer uses the Standard estimate on the pricing page calculator.
Greptile charges per completed review, so its bill follows pull request volume and review depth. At $1 a credit, 100 Base reviews cost $100 a month, the same number of Plus reviews $300 and Apex reviews $1,000. Seat-priced alternatives stay flat per developer instead.
The alternatives, one by one
1. HeyDeer: highest precision, no seat fees
Strengths: an independent reviewer for every pull request, whether a person or a coding agent wrote it. Every finding is checked against your code before it’s posted, which is where the 99.0% ReviewBench precision comes from. Reviews follow your REVIEW.md, AGENTS.md and repository checks on every plan, and Fix with HeyDeer opens a fix pull request for the findings you pick. Autopilot keeps fixing findings, failing checks and merge conflicts until the pull request is ready to merge.
Pricing: Free (1,000 credits in the first month, then 300 a month), Starter $9 and Pro $39 a month per workspace, with unlimited developers and repositories and no hourly review caps.
Fits: GitHub teams, especially those where coding agents open many of the pull requests and act on review comments, so every false positive turns into extra work. HeyDeer vs Greptile
2. Cursor Bugbot
Strengths: Built into Cursor, so teams already working there turn it on without a new vendor. It supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps, and Autofix hands findings to Cursor’s cloud agents. On ReviewBench it scores 96.0% precision and 44.5% recall.
Pricing: Usage-based, about $1.00–$1.50 per run on average. Individuals use their included Cursor usage first; teams pay from prepaid credit. Each review and re-review is a separate run. For 10 developers: $100–$150 a month.
Fits: Teams that live in Cursor and open a moderate number of pull requests. Busy pull requests with many pushes add a charge per run. HeyDeer vs Cursor Bugbot
3. Qodo
Strengths: Supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps, with Gerrit on Enterprise, and meters reviews from one credit pack the team shares. On ReviewBench it scores 95.3% precision and 53.3% recall.
Pricing: Pro Team credits cost $0.012 each, pooled across the team. Qodo estimates about 144 reviews from 20,000 credits, roughly $1.67 a review. Pro Team is designed for up to 30 users; Enterprise covers larger teams. A 14-day trial needs no credit card. For 10 developers: $167 a month.
Fits: Teams of up to 30 users who want usage-based pricing on any major Git host. HeyDeer vs Qodo
4. cubic
Strengths: A GitHub reviewer with a fixed allowance of reviewed lines per developer, and integrations with Jira, Linear, Asana and Confluence. On ReviewBench it scores 93.5% precision and 22.1% recall.
Pricing: $32 (Team) or $79.20 (Pro) per developer a month billed annually, 20% below the monthly price. Team covers 40,000 reviewed lines per developer and Pro 80,000. For 10 developers: $320 a month.
Fits: GitHub teams that want a predictable per-developer bill and stay within the line allowance. HeyDeer vs cubic
5. CodeRabbit
Strengths: The widest platform coverage in this list: GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket. Every plan also reviews code before the pull request, in the CLI, in IDE extensions for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf, and inside coding-agent loops, and includes static analysis, secrets, dependency and infrastructure checks.
Pricing: $24 (Essentials) or $48 (Team) per developer a month, billed annually, for every developer who opens pull requests. Custom checks start on Team, and each developer gets 5 (Essentials) or 8 (Team) reviews an hour. Reviews are free on public repositories. For 10 developers: $240 a month.
Fits: Teams spread across several Git hosts, or teams that want the same reviewer in the editor and on the pull request. Cost grows with every developer who opens a pull request. HeyDeer vs CodeRabbit
6. Claude Code Review
Strengths: Several agents read each change, a verification step filters out false positives, and findings arrive as inline comments with a check run. Reviews follow REVIEW.md and CLAUDE.md, and Quick, Standard and Deep levels trade depth for cost.
Pricing: Token usage billed on top of a Claude Team or Enterprise plan. The only published figure is a research-preview average of $15–$25 per review. For 10 developers: $1,500–$2,500 a month at the research-preview average.
Fits: Organizations already on Claude Team or Enterprise with repositories on GitHub. HeyDeer vs Claude Code Review
7. Graphite
Strengths: A pull request workflow built around stacked changes, with AI review as one part of it. It works with GitHub, including personal repositories and GitHub Enterprise Server.
Pricing: Hobby is free with limited AI reviews. Starter is $20 and Team $40 per user a month, billed annually; Team is the plan with unlimited AI reviews. For 10 developers: $400 a month.
Fits: Teams that want stacked pull requests as much as they want review. Every user is a paid seat on Team. HeyDeer vs Graphite
Where Greptile itself fits
Greptile builds a graph of every function, class and dependency in a repository, so a review can follow a change into the code it affects. It learns from your team’s 👍 and 👎 reactions and replies, offers cross-repository context and a Knowledge Base MCP on Pro, and lets you pick deeper Plus (3 credits) and Apex (10 credits) reviews for the changes that need them. An optional TREX run adds 3 credits.
On ReviewBench’s default high-severity view, Greptile scores 95.2% precision and 20.2% recall. HeyDeer scores 99.0% and 51.4%, and Cursor Bugbot 96.0% and 44.5%. Higher recall means fewer missed issues; higher precision means fewer comments that waste a developer’s or an agent’s time.
Teams on a self-hosted Git server can stay with Greptile Enterprise, which supports GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab Self-Managed, Bitbucket Data Center and Gitea. Teams that prefer a monthly plan to prepaid credits can compare it with the seat and workspace plans above.
How to choose a Greptile alternative
- Start with your Git host. On GitLab, Bitbucket or Azure DevOps, the shortlist is CodeRabbit, Cursor Bugbot and Qodo. On GitHub, every tool here works.
- Price your real workload. Multiply developers by pull requests per developer, then add re-reviews. Credit and per-run pricing follow that number; seat pricing follows headcount; a workspace plan follows neither. Our ranking of AI code review tools prices the same workload on each.
- Decide what a wrong comment costs. If coding agents act on review comments, rank by precision first. If people triage every comment, recall may matter more.
- Keep your rules where they already are. HeyDeer and Claude Code Review both read REVIEW.md, and HeyDeer also follows AGENTS.md, so one set of review rules serves several tools.
- Run two tools on the same ten pull requests. Score useful findings, false positives and time spent with our guide to evaluating AI code review.
The cheapest Greptile alternative depends on volume. For 10 developers opening 100 pull requests a month, HeyDeer costs $14, Cursor Bugbot $100–$150, Qodo $167 and CodeRabbit Essentials $240, against $100 for Greptile Base reviews.
For the method behind HeyDeer’s precision score, read our ReviewBench results.
Sources
- Greptile pricing
- Greptile docs: billing
- Greptile docs: code providers
- ReviewBench leaderboard (default high-severity view)
- Cursor Bugbot pricing changes
- Cursor Bugbot documentation
- Qodo pricing
- cubic pricing
- CodeRabbit pricing
- CodeRabbit rate limits
- Claude Code Review pricing
- Claude Code Review documentation
- Graphite pricing
- CodeRabbit documentation
- cubic documentation
Frequently asked questions
What are the best Greptile alternatives?
HeyDeer, Cursor Bugbot, Qodo, cubic, CodeRabbit, Claude Code Review and Graphite. HeyDeer leads ReviewBench on precision at 99.0% and charges per workspace with no seat fees. CodeRabbit covers the most Git hosts, Bugbot fits Cursor teams, Qodo meters reviews from a shared credit pack, and Graphite pairs review with stacked pull requests.
Is there a free Greptile alternative?
HeyDeer has a recurring Free plan with 1,000 credits in the first month and 300 every month after, for unlimited developers and no credit card. Graphite’s Hobby plan includes limited AI reviews, and CodeRabbit reviews public repositories for free. Greptile’s own Starter plan is free for one developer with 50 credits a month.
Which Greptile alternatives support GitLab or Bitbucket?
CodeRabbit, Cursor Bugbot and Qodo support GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps. HeyDeer, cubic, Graphite and Claude Code Review are built for GitHub. Greptile itself supports GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket Cloud, with self-hosted Git servers on Enterprise.
How much does Greptile cost?
Greptile Pro charges $1 per prepaid credit, shared across the organization with no seat fees. A Base review uses 1 credit, a Plus review 3 and an Apex review 10. Starter is free for one developer with 50 credits a month, Pro has a 14-day trial, and Enterprise is custom.
Is Greptile better than CodeRabbit?
They suit different teams. Greptile bills per review credit and builds a graph of the repository; CodeRabbit bills per developer, supports four Git hosts and reviews in the IDE and CLI too. For 10 developers opening 100 pull requests a month, Greptile Base reviews cost $100 and CodeRabbit Essentials $240.
Which AI code reviewer has the fewest false positives?
On ReviewBench’s default high-severity view, HeyDeer has the highest precision at 99.0%, followed by Cursor Bugbot (96.0%), Qodo (95.3%) and Greptile (95.2%). Precision changes with the severity filter, so test on your own pull requests as well.
Does HeyDeer charge per seat?
Every HeyDeer plan includes unlimited developers and repositories. Paid plans cost $9 (Starter) or $39 (Pro) a month per workspace, and the whole workspace shares one credit balance.
How does Greptile compare with Claude Code Review?
Claude Code Review needs a Claude Team or Enterprise plan, works on GitHub, and bills token usage; its only published figure is a research-preview average of $15–$25 per review. Greptile sells $1 credits on any plan and also supports GitLab and Bitbucket Cloud.
